TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
Central Saanich applicants may rely on a professional qualification, outside business support, operating reserves or company funding. Identify the actual requirement and the evidence that meets it. A promise, label or account balance may leave important conditions unresolved. A first review therefore produces a table of conditions with one column for the requirement, one for the document that meets it, and one for the documents still missing. An entry that reads “vendor will cover” or “reserves available” is a gap, not an answer.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Explore TN, L-1A, L-1B, E-2, EB-5 and Gold Card through illustrative planning situations. These examples do not claim special local eligibility rules or applicant prevalence. Each situation is worked through the records that decide it: a staffing agreement and delegation for a manager over agency labour, the traced path of funds already spent for an investor, the payroll history for a transferee, and the passport and licence for a professional.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Connect the job to its particular qualifications.

An interdisciplinary background does not create a new TN profession. A vendor contract does not prove every operational task is covered. Company revenue does not automatically become personal investment capital. Connect the proposal to the real facts. Before writing anything, gather the contracts that describe support, the bank statements that show what has actually moved, the payroll record that fixes the qualifying year, and the corporate documents that link the entities. Those four sets settle most questions about what is real today.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
State the professional, role, funding or eligibility condition being addressed. Write the condition in the words the rule uses rather than in the words of the offer, because a requirement phrased as senior experience hides which of degree, licence or years actually decides it.
Read the credentials, delivered services, rights and committed funds. Sort what you hold into promised, ordered and delivered. A quotation is a price, a purchase order is an intention, and a paid invoice with a bank debit is a completed transaction.
Keep proposed payments and staffing visible as proposals. Set a review date beside each dependency and say what happens if it is unmet, so a hiring plan that slips does not quietly become the reason a later filing is refused.
Use actual case milestones rather than assuming a commitment guarantees the outcome. Treat approval to spend and permission to act as two different events, and record the second only when an official notice, admission stamp or issued document says it has happened.
Careful preparation distinguishes support that exists from support still planned. It also identifies which funds, authority and permissions belong to which person or entity. Sequence the work so filings describe present facts. Negotiate vendor hours and authority clauses before the petition, hire the supervisors before the manager is described as managing them, commit the purchase funds before the E-2 application, and confirm official program terms on the day money moves.
Find your pathwayBring the effective agreements and relevant records, and identify dependencies early. Confirm the professional scope and charges. Private commitments should remain distinguishable from government instructions and decisions. The review usually returns one of three verdicts for each condition: proven by a document in hand, provable once a named record is obtained, or not provable on the current plan. The third category is where the plan itself must change, and it is better found in a review than in a refusal.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
Use the requirements of the profession that fits the actual work; do not invent a blended standard.
Assess the actual duties, authority and operational support delivered.
No blanket exclusion should be assumed; review actual commitment, risk and enterprise facts.
Trace lawful entitlement and the actual distribution and investment rather than equating revenue with the investor’s funds.
They can be part of the picture, but directing agency line workers day to day looks like first-line supervision of nonprofessional workers, which does not qualify by title alone. Show supervisors or professionals beneath the manager, or a function she controls at a senior level, and attach the agency agreement that defines her authority over it.
They can, if the escrow releases the funds to the seller on the sole condition that the visa or status is granted, so the investor cannot recover them once approval issues. Escrow that the investor can cancel at will, or reserves still sitting in a Canadian account, do not show funds at risk.
There is no fixed figure. Substantiality is proportional: the amount is weighed against the total cost of buying an established business or creating a viable new one, and a modest service business can qualify on a sum that would be plainly insufficient for a manufacturer. The lower the total cost, the closer to one hundred percent the investor's share must sit. The funds must also be irrevocably committed and at risk.
It depends on how the arrangement really operates. The letter must name the employer, the listed profession, the duties, the pay and the period, and describe where and for whom the work is performed. An arrangement that leaves a client directing the professional invites questions about who the employer actually is. Self-employment is not permitted under TN, and any ownership stake in either company should be disclosed.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.