No. The applicable process and actual government decision still matter.
Use realistic case milestones
Prepare the real facts without promising that urgency controls the result. A staffing deadline does not permit work before the necessary authorization exists.
Review whether the proposed duties still rely on the knowledge described in the filing, especially if the revised process is materially different. A customer's delivery deadline should not be treated as permission to start an assignment whose immigration basis has not yet been confirmed. Identify the employee’s current location and authorized activities, the evidence still outstanding and the actual proposed worksite. If the employee will be stationed primarily at an unaffiliated employer’s worksite, that employer cannot principally control and supervise the employee, and the placement cannot be essentially an arrangement to provide labour for hire. A delayed project may affect the planned duties or other relevant facts, even if the company still wants the same employee. Preparation should be planned around those, with government steps treated as a further period that cannot be pinned to a date. Have the actual change and required process assessed before relying on the placement. Keep remote preparation from abroad distinct from work performed inside the United States, and do not treat the training launch date as a government decision deadline.