Skip to content
CENTRAL SAANICH · L-1A FIELD GUIDE

Does a large outsourcing bill establish the necessary managerial support?

Sources checked:

THE DIRECT ANSWER

The expense does not show by itself what operational work is performed or what the applicant does.

Assess service scope rather than price alone

Identify the actual delivery and remaining tasks. Professional preparation fees and government charges are separate from the commercial service contract and do not guarantee qualification.

Separate filing costs from the commercial spending needed to make the claimed role real. Government fees and professional preparation costs do not demonstrate a qualifying relationship, a year of foreign employment, or managerial duties. For a new office, lease commitments, staffing costs, and operating capital may be relevant because they show whether the proposed operation can support the role within a year; they should be documented as actual obligations, not rounded estimates. A first review should classify every cost as immigration processing, proof of operations, or ordinary business expense. That makes it easier to see when a budget is being used to hide a staffing gap. Do not commit to a long lease solely for an immigration description if the business has not made that commercial decision. The transferee still requires continuous full-time service abroad for a year in the applicable three-year period, and L-1A status normally has a seven-year ceiling. Hypothetical example: a bicycle-components wholesaler budgets for a large US warehouse but has no money for a warehouse supervisor. The lease quote is not the decisive record. The staffing budget, signed supervisor offer, and manager’s delegated authority show whether the proposed transferee will direct the operation or spend each day unloading stock.