No. A private timetable does not control vetting, visa availability, admissibility or the residence process.
Avoid commitments based on a promised decision
Use actual official milestones to plan the move. Application preparation, a processing payment and the instructed gift are not interchangeable with completed admission or adjustment.
Confirm the current terms and authorized payment steps rather than assuming a preferred conversion date requires government action. Address an access issue promptly through the applicable process; a contact problem does not automatically extend a deadline or guarantee a fixed residence date. Recheck the framework before acting, especially if the proposal or family circumstances change, and avoid fixing housing, employment, or school commitments around an assumed approval date. Sequence the decision by confirming the live product first, then having counsel identify the immigrant classification and evidence available, before restructuring assets or making commitments. The published material describes vetting in terms of weeks, but that is a description and not a promise, and later stages depend on visa availability and any interview. Nobody legitimate needs a payment sent to a private account, an agent or a facilitation service in order to secure a place, and pressure to act before a deadline nobody can point to is a reason to stop rather than hurry.