TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
Sidney applicants may be relying on years of service, an earlier case, a wire total, a staffing roster or a family headcount. Each summary can hide distinctions that matter. Examine what is actually being counted and what the current evidence supports. A first review therefore produces a summary-to-source ledger: every total or past result the applicant relies on, the record that stands behind it, and whether that record actually reaches the requirement. Bring prior approval notices, I-94 records, payroll or contractor histories, bank statements for every transfer, and civil documents for each family member.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Review TN, L-1A, L-1B, E-2, EB-5 and Gold Card through concrete planning questions. The examples illustrate decisions without attributing particular applicant patterns to the community. Totals mislead differently in each route: for TN the earlier approval, for L-1 the years of service, for E-2 the amount spent, for EB-5 the headcount, for Gold Card the household size. The review takes each figure apart before it decides which route the underlying facts support.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Use the current offer and accurate history.

Long employment is not a complete knowledge explanation. A returned wire and replacement are not two separate contributions. Twenty names do not automatically establish ten qualifying full-time jobs. Use the applicable facts and definitions before relying on a total. Ask what would remain if the summary were removed. If the argument for management survives without the twelve-year figure, the figure was decoration; if it does not, the case rests on tenure rather than duties and needs different evidence. Do the same test for every number before it goes in a letter.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
State the past decision, years, amount or headcount relied on. Write it as the applicant would say it in a sentence, such as approved twice before, twelve years with the company, or forty staff, so the claim can be tested.
Read the actual duties, money movement, positions or family status. A prior approval sits in a file with the letter that earned it; tenure sits in payroll records; headcount sits in schedules and job descriptions; a household sits in birth and marriage certificates.
Determine which facts satisfy the requirement and which do not. Twelve years of service may contain only three in a qualifying role; forty staff may include part-time and non-qualifying positions; a repeated approval may rest on duties that have since changed.
Track actual permission and residence milestones instead of assuming a repeated outcome. Each admission, approval notice and I-94 record carries its own dates, and a conditional-residence anniversary or an L-1 maximum is counted from those records, not from the first time the case succeeded.
A clear assessment preserves both the history and the current position. Identify what has changed, what has actually been paid and which person needs which permission. Order the work so that the records exist before the summary is written: obtain the payroll history before describing the role, reconcile the bank trail before stating the amount invested, confirm each child’s date of birth before describing the household. A summary written last is a summary that can be checked.
Find your pathwayBring the underlying records rather than only a summary figure. Clarify the professional work requested and the charges involved. Government decisions remain separate from private estimates and earlier outcomes. Send the records themselves, not a description of them, ahead of the remote consultation, and flag any total you have already quoted to an employer, a seller or a family member. The first written output pairs each figure with its source and marks the ones that need better evidence or a narrower claim.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
Review current duties, terms and eligibility; an earlier outcome is not a guarantee.
Explain actual expertise and its relevance to the US assignment.
Do not count the same money twice; reconcile the complete payment history.
Identify actual citizenship and eligibility. A US citizen does not need immigrant admission as a derivative.
Part-time professional work is permitted under TN as long as the duties and qualifications meet the listed profession and the remuneration arrangement is documented; TN has no minimum-hours rule. Two employers are also possible, but each engagement needs its own TN authorization: a Canadian citizen presents a separate letter for each at the port of entry, or each employer files its own I-129. Each role must qualify on its own; the hours do not need to be combined to reach a threshold.
It depends on what secures the loan. Money borrowed on the investor’s personal liability, or secured by personal assets such as a home in Canada, counts because the investor loses it if the business fails. Money borrowed against the assets of the enterprise itself does not count, since the lender rather than the investor carries the risk. Keep the loan agreement, the security documents and the disbursement records together so the reviewer can see which kind it is.
Only brief trips to the United States for business or pleasure do not interrupt the continuous year abroad, and those US days do not count toward the year. An eight-month US work assignment is not automatically treated as a brief trip and may interrupt the claimed period. The applicant may still qualify by proving a separate continuous full year of qualifying employment outside the United States within the three years before the petition, so the reviewer will examine travel and employment records month by month rather than rely on the twelve-year total.
Treat the two as different kinds of money. EB-5 capital is an investment placed at risk in a commercial enterprise, and it may be returned by that enterprise after the required period if the project performs. The Gold Card contribution is described in the official framework as a gift to the U.S. government, with a processing fee, and a gift is not an investment that earns a return. Confirm refund terms on the official page before any money moves.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.